2. Provided, That the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive;

3.

Around October 22, 2013, the Defendant testified that “A, the Defendant’s domicile, was false, and around 14:00 on April 10, 2013, the Defendant: “Around 351, 352, 353, 354, 355, or 371 of the building located in Seongbuk-gu, Seongbuk-gu, Sungwon-si, Sungwon-si, the title holder of the said building, was present as a witness of the suit on the claim, including facility costs, No. 2012 or 6718, and there was no son, and there was no son.” The Defendant testified that E, G, and C had false testimony; “A lessee was aware that the lessor would accept the lease contract and paid KRW 15 million,500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,00).”

However, at the time, the defendant introduced E and C as G with only one, and demanded E to change the premium of KRW 15 million, and the funeral service has been well known for more than 12 months, and if E is unable to continue to operate, the defendant would take over the premium again, and the premium of KRW 15 million paid from E was returned to him at any time as deposit money and entered into a lease agreement with E with him, and such agreement was entered in the special terms of the lease agreement.

Nevertheless, on October 22, 2013, the Defendant filed and received a complaint stating false facts to C with the public service center of the Changwon Police Station in order to have C punished criminal punishment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Examination protocol of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Each prosecutor’s statement concerning E and H. 1.