유족급여및장의비부지급처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in this case is that the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the following parts, and thus, it shall be cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of
The second "paragraph (c)" of the first instance judgment shall be written in the following manner:
C. The legal officer of the National Scientific Investigation Institute presumed the deceased’s private person to be “hovascular heart disease caused by the sculmatation of heart scule.”
In the above autopsy report, the reference point is that the supply of oxygens that require the heart is due to the emulsion of the heart, most of which is caused by the emulculation of the heart. The emulculation of the heart bed by the heart bedo, and the inception of the heart bed or closed, and there is a high blood pressure, urine, smoking, and emulculation, etc. with the risk factors of the heart bedromatic emulculation. The verctic disease shows the results of the stimulious, heart color, cardio-higher, and chronic tyrosisic heart disease, and in general, it is known that it can be caused by the acute death in the event the heart heart is 75% or more of the heart emulculation."
The fourth and fourth 10th 10 of the judgment of the court of first instance read “Witness F and G” as “Witness F and G of the court of first instance,” and the first 1th “this court” as “court of the court of first instance,” respectively, and thereafter add “the result of this court’s entrustment of appraisal to the president of the Association of Korean Doctors.”
The following shall be added to the 7th page of the first instance judgment.
In addition, as a result of the above health examination, the deceased was suspected of liver diseases due to drinking, and there were geological blood transfusions and smoking capabilities.
The following shall be added to the 7th end of the judgment of the first instance.
On the other hand, it is unreasonable to refer directly to the private person on the basis of the "the result of this court's entrustment of appraisal."