2. The judgment of the court below is based on the following facts: (a) the defendant led to the confession and reflect of each of the crimes of this case; (b) the degree of injury suffered by the victim of a traffic accident is relatively minor; (c) the victim was subscribed to a comprehensive insurance; (d) the court below decided that the victim did not want punishment; (e) there was no record of criminal punishment as the first offender; and (e) the defendant supported his/her family members who are not healthy health; (b) each of the crimes of this case does not take any measures against the victim's vehicle due to the negligence during driving; and (c) the defendant escaped without taking any measures against the traffic accident causing human and material damage; and (d) the crime is not good in light of the contents of the crime; (e) in particular, the circumstances after the escape without any measures that cause a big traffic accident to the extent that his/her vehicle will be recovered; (e) the court below's selection of imprisonment before the court below and then determined the lower court's punishment by considering the favorable circumstances for the defendant; and (e) the motive and circumstances of the defendant's punishment; (e.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.