임대차보증금
1. The defendant's assistant intervenor's participation shall be permitted;
2. All appeals by the defendant against the plaintiffs are dismissed.
3.
1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, and the reasoning for the court’s explanation is as follows: (a) the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is amended as follows; and (b) the reasoning for the judgment of the court of first instance is the same as that for the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the addition
The following parts shall be added to four pages of the first instance judgment:
[In addition, the above agreement constitutes a special agreement to bring an action.] From five to five to five to five to five to five to five to five to five to five to five to the court of first instance.
[General, who is a party to a contract constitutes a matter of interpretation of the intent of the party involved in the contract. Interpretation of intent constitutes a matter of interpretation of the party involved in the contract. The objective meaning that the party has given the party to the contract to the contract to the contract in writing, which is a disposal document, should be reasonably interpreted according to the contents of the contract, regardless of the party’s internal intent, if the content of the contract is written in writing. In this case, unless there is any special circumstance, unless the objective meaning of the text is clear, the existence of the party’s expression of intent and its contents should be recognized (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2009Da92487, May 13, 2010). In full view of the following circumstances, namely, the fact that the netF of the lease contract of this case is written as the lessee, the networkF, and G residing in the apartment house of this case, and the circumstances surrounding the conclusion of the lease contract of this case, the parties to the contract of this case and the parties to this case 3 were presented.