However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

On July 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at his own residential parking lot located in Ulsan-gu BB, Ulsan-gu, Seoul-gu, 2018, the Defendant: (b) told the victim that he was not taking the examination of the victim C (37 years of age) who is his usual seat; (c) was found by the victim; (d) when the victim was sprinked and sprinked with the victim; and (d) when the victim’s head was sprinked by hand after the victim was sprinked, the Defendant sprinked the victim for approximately 10 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1. Application of C’s written laws and regulations

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting the crime, and Article 257 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the suspended sentence under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act [the scope of recommendation] general injury (the scope of recommendation] is limited to the case where the victim is fully responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage (the case where the victim first fights the time expenses so that the victim would incur the time expenses so that he/she would be responsible for the occurrence of a crime or the expansion of damage (the case where the victim would be sentenced] / The amount of serious injury (the case where the victim would be at the time of mutual fighting), and the victim wanted to withdraw his/her intention of not to punish so

The punishment shall be determined as per the order, taking into consideration the fact that the defendant has not been guilty and has not exceeded the same kind of fine and has committed seriously against the crime.