However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On February 12, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million by the Gwangju District Court as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act.

On April 24, 2020, the Defendant, at around 23:59, driven a car under the influence of alcohol with approximately 100 meters alcohol concentration of 0.232% in the section of approximately 100 meters from the roads near the school dong-gu, Gwangju to the front roads in the same Gu.

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Criminal records, etc. and the application of double-entry Acts and subordinate statutes of two copies of a summary order;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The sentencing period of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act includes the defendant's records of the same crime, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime of this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place where the defendant was drunk driving, and the fact that the defendant is divided into his mistake, and other sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, shall be determined as ordered.