However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 20, 2014, from around 05:00 to 05:20 of the same day, the Defendant obstructed the general restaurant business of the victim of the instant restaurant by the victim D in Kim Sea from around 05:00 to around 05:20 of the same day, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol, expressed the desire to other customers, such as F, etc. in his own side, and took a cell phone, collected the mobile phone, collected the boom, cryp, etc., and interfered with the general restaurant business of the victim by force.

2. 공무집행방해 피고인은 위 1항 기재 일시, 장소에서 그 기재와 같이 소란을 부리다 신고를 받고 출동한 G지구대 소속 경찰관인 경사 H으로부터 제지를 받자, 경사 H에게 “야, 이 씨발 새끼야, 내가 피해자인데 나보고 가라 하노. 저 새끼들이 잘못했다. 너거가 경찰이가, 내가 누군지 모르제. 좆같은 새끼야, 호로 잡놈의 새끼야, 니 목 잘라삔다”는 등 욕설을 하며 경사 H의 멱살을 잡아 밀치는 등 폭행하였다.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to H, I, and F;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( normal consideration, such as the absence of criminal records in addition to the punishment of a fine for a violation of the Road Traffic Act, and the agreement with the victims);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;