건물명도(인도)
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B: The real estate listed in the annex 2 list;
B. Defendant C shall provide the real estate listed in the Appendix 3 list.
The plaintiff asserts as stated in the annexed cause of claim. The defendants are deemed to have led to confession under Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.
There is no evidence to prove that the Plaintiff agreed to pay KRW 3,00,000 to Defendant B for directors’ expenses.
[In light of the fact that the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay expenses for moving a house and the claim for expenses for moving a house recognized by the Act on the Acquisition of Land, etc. for Public Works and the Compensation therefor, the Enforcement Decree thereof, and the Enforcement Rule are not aimed at compensating for losses incurred by the public works legally enforced as a right under the public law, but rather at the social security level, it cannot be deemed that the Plaintiff’s obligation to pay expenses for moving a house has a preferential performance or a concurrent performance relationship with the Defendant B’s obligation to deliver the building of this case] Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim for the delivery against the Defendants of this case is reasonable, and thus