개발제한구역의지정및관리에관한특별조치법위반
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Criminal facts
The Defendant is a person who operates a restaurant with the trade name “D” in Gwangju City.
No one shall construct a building or alter its use, install a structure, change the form and quality of land, etc. in a development restriction zone without obtaining permission from the competent authority.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, without obtaining permission from the competent authority, installs a gate on the E, F, and G, 904.32 square meters, which is a development-restricted zone, in the middle of April 2014, and changes the form and quality of a parking lot on the 282 square meters, and installs a plastic house on the 397.25 square meters, and thus, it is obvious that a total of 1,583.57 square meters of indictments on the 1589.57 square meters of a total of 1,58 square meters of indictment
In order to change the form and quality or install a structure without permission.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A H statement;
1. A written investigation report, a certified copy of cadastral map, land cadastre, and written confirmation of land use plan;
1. Application of the location map, photographs, and current status photograph statutes;
1. Article 32 of the Act on Special Measures for Designation and Management of Areas of Restricted Development and Article 12 (1) of the Act on Special Measures for Designation of Areas of Restricted Development and the Selection of Imprisonment concerning facts constituting an offense;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (the suspension of execution of a sentence shall be suspended, in consideration of the fact that the defendant without permission changes in the form and quality, or the area of installation of a structure, etc. is less than that of such crime, but wrong and reflects the fact that there are no particular criminal records other than twice in minor