The Defendants agreed to the lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants for a continuous period of not less than three months at the time of the termination of the lease agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendants on March 16, 2012, the real estate listed in the No. 2 List No. 1 A No. 106,000,000 won 76,000 won 76,00,000 won 390,000 won on March 16, 2012, listed in the No. 3 of the above List No. 3 of the Real Estate No. 3,648,000 won on June 3, 2014, which was 408,720 won and 44D on September 28, 2011. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 175043, Sep. 28, 2011; Presidential Decree No. 17504, Mar. 30, 2004>

However, by November 2015, Defendant A did not pay the difference of KRW 13,326,670 for 18 months; KRW 7,345,840 for Defendant B; KRW 6,957,550 for 17 months; and KRW 7,576,030 for Defendant D for 16 months.

The complaint of this case, stating the Plaintiff’s intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds that the Defendants had been in arrears for more than three consecutive months, was served on each of the Defendants.

Therefore, since each of the instant lease agreements was terminated according to the Plaintiff’s declaration of intention of termination, the Defendants are obligated to deliver each leased real estate to the Plaintiff.

[The defendant did not submit a written answer within 30 days from the date on which he was served with the complaint, and thus, the facts constituting the cause of the claim pursuant to the main sentence of Article 257(1) of the Civil Procedure Act shall be deemed to have been led to the confession, and the judgment shall be rendered without holding any pleadings, and only the matters necessary to specify the claim pursuant to Article 208(