However, the above sentence shall be executed for three years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A is the representative of G company engaged in construction and steel structure construction business in the area F in the area population at the time of tolerance-si, and the defendant B is a farmer engaged in flowers farming.

Defendant

A knowing the fact that the State, local governments, etc., as part of measures to support the efficient use of energy in facilities, etc. by the State, local governments, etc., intended to subsidize part of the total construction cost as a part of the measures to support the installation of facilities, etc., and promised to pay all or part of the self-paid charges to farmers who are not capable of paying self-paid charges, or to refund all or part of the self-paid charges to farmers, and to refund all or part of the self-paid charges to farmers. In collusion with farmers, Defendant A entered into a contract with them to refund construction cost as much as the self-paid charges are paid by them or refunded, and Defendant A did not pay for the whole or part of the construction cost.

1. Defendant A, in collusion with H, who is a farmer on April 201, installed a 39,83,00 won with subsidies of KRW 23,166,00 in total and self-payment charges of KRW 16,651,00 in total and KRW 16,817,000 in total and KRW 39,817,00 in total and KRW 39,816,000 in total, in collusion with H around April 3, 201, the Defendant: (a) filed an application with the said 39,817,000 in total and KRW 39,817,00 in total and KRW 6,00 in total; (b) filed an application with the said 39,817,000 in total and KRW 16,51,00 in total and KRW 16,00 in total; and (c) filed with the said 36,000 in total and KRW 16,000 in the instant account.