A. The sentence of the lower court (the imprisonment of eight months, confiscation, collection of 50 million won) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unreasonable.

2. We examine the judgment, and the fact that the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case is favorable to the defendant.

However, the act of arranging sexual traffic of this case has great social harm, such as commercialization of sex and harm to the sound sexual culture and good morals, the defendant has been punished for the same kind of crime, and the crime of this case has not been light in light of the period, size, profit, etc., which is disadvantageous to the defendant.

In addition, there is no change in the sentencing conditions compared to the original judgment, and considering all the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unfluent so that it cannot be deemed unfair. Thus, the above assertion by the Defendant and the prosecutor is without merit.

3. In conclusion, since the appeal by the defendant and the prosecutor is without merit, all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.