임금
1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 26,001,948; (b) KRW 15,432,093; and (c) KRW 17,744,582 to the Appointed; and (d) KRW 17,74,582 to the Appointed.
According to the purport of the evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and the whole arguments, the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties entered into an employment contract with the defendant and retired from office as stated in the following table of service. However, the defendant delayed payment of the wages incurred during the period of service of the plaintiff (appointed party) and the designated parties as stated in the table of the wage in arrears under the following table, and the defendant did not pay the overdue wages and retirement allowances within 14 days from the date of each retirement, and there is no other counter-proof.
The Defendant is obligated to pay the 3rd 5th 7th 205th 205th 205th 205th 4,277,483 21,724,465th 26,001 or 948th 2,685th 2,680,645th 12,751,448th 15,432,093 205th 207th 205th 205th 207th 205th 205th 207th 205th 207th 205th 205th 207th 205th 205th 207th 207th 205th 207th 205th 207th 205th 3th 207th 207.3th 205th 2013
The claim of the plaintiff (appointed party) shall be accepted as reasonable.