If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a dentist, as the director of the Ethical clinic located in Busan Shipping Daegu D.

At around 16:20 on May 28, 2013, the Defendant treated the victim F (six years of age) who was f (six years of age) with a view to shakeing down the right side of the E dental clinic.

In such cases, when reviewing the name, resident registration number, address, and first diagnosis of the patient who was resistant, a dentist has a duty of care to check whether the patient's name, resident registration number, address, and first diagnosis are the same person, and to check whether there was a permanent or permanent loss by means of radiation photographing, etc. if the patient was exposed to unsworn custody, a dentist has a duty of care.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not photograph the body part of the victim’s body ray, and did not look at only the radiation photograph of the name of the person who is not the victim, as presented by the nurse on his name, and did not look at only the body part of the victim’s body ray, sent one front of the right part of the lower part of the body part of the body part of the victim’s for a long time, and did not confirm whether there was a permanent shot or permanent shot loss, thereby causing injury to the victim by neglecting that part of the body part of the body part.

Summary of Evidence

1. The part of the statement made by the defendant to the effect that he/she misleads another person into being a victim of his/her photographic photograph;

1. The police statement concerning G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes governing safics;

1. Article 268 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Determination as to the assertion by the defendant and his/her defense counsel under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The defendant's act of care of the defendant cannot be viewed as illegal, since the defendant's act of care of the victim's body was committed by the victim for the oral cavity health.

In general, it is urgent to reduce the age of 6 to 7.