beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2014.04.10 2014고정211

전자금융거래법위반등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant violated the Electronic Financial Transactions Act, upon receiving a proposal to register as a business operator from P and C, proposed that D shall register “E” in its name and establish a passbook.

As a result, D opened a passbook (Account Number F) at the branch of the National Bank Research Institute of Korea located in 1591-6, Mayang-dong, Dongyang-dong, 1591-6, in early October 2012, and around that time, the Defendant acquired the means of access, such as the passbook and one head of the check card and the password.

2. No one shall lend money by pretending the sale of goods or provision of services in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act, or by making a transaction by credit cards in excess of the actual amount of sales;

On October 2012, the Defendant: (a) submitted a business registration certificate, passbook copy, and business license certificate of “E” opened in the name of “G” agency near the Geumsan-si, Annyang-si; and (b) purchased one of the portable card size and issued it to be used in order to carry the card tin; and (c) sold it to the card tin.

Accordingly, around 15:49:30 on October 16, 2012, 2012, C and C paid 350,000 won by the credit card (credit card No. H) issued by the credit card company (credit card No.) with the “E”, which was forged in the portable card size, issued by the Defendant, as above, as seen above, and paid 12,670,000 won over 12 times as shown in the annexed crime list. The Defendant, as shown in the annexed crime list, withdrawn 8,790,00 won from the national bank account, such as the preceding paragraph of D in which the payment was remitted, and then delivered 7,790,000 won to B and C.

By pretending to sell goods or provide services, the Defendant provided funds to sexually B and C through credit card transactions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police suspect interrogation protocol against the defendant, D, and I;

1. The statement of the J (not more than 425 pages of investigation records) and CCTV photographs of D.