A. The punishment of the lower court (unfair imprisonment for eight months) is too unreasonable.

B. The above sentence of the lower court is too unhued and unfair.

2. The conclusion that the Defendant recognized the instant crime is favorable, but there are many times of violence criminal records against the Defendant, and in particular, even though it is a repeated crime due to the victim C-related criminal records, the Defendant committed the instant crime in relation to the victim C, and did not agree with the victims.

There are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments, the lower court’s punishment is too heavy or unreasonable.

The defendant and prosecutor's arguments are not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the appeal filed by the defendant and the prosecutor is groundless, and all of them are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.