소유권이전등기
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasons for this court's instructions are as follows: "In the fourth eightth half of the judgment of the court of first instance," "In the currency unit"; "58,984 won" in the fourth nine nine fourth nine nineth of the judgment of the court of first instance; "I" in the fourth fourth seventh reduction "E"; "I" in the fifth seventh seventh reduction "amount" in "E"; "I" in the sixth fourth and fourth reduction below "E"; "I" in the fifth below "E"; and "I" in the fifth below the sixth second and fifth half below" in the second half below; "I" in the second below, "I do not have any administrative measures necessary for the defendant to dispose of the land of this case even if D, which was not the ownership of the land of this case before the division of the land of this case," as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of first instance; therefore, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
(1) The plaintiff asserted that the judgment of the court of first instance omitted judgment on the plaintiff's claim for damages based on the plaintiff's unlawful act, but it is clear that the plaintiff's claim of this case is not constituted an illegal act as alleged by the plaintiff according to the statement 6th or 5th following the 7th of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal of this case is dismissed as