beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2014.09.12 2014노1860

사기

Text

The judgment below

Of them, the part against Defendant A shall be reversed.

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Defendant

B.

Reasons

Summary of Grounds for Appeal

Defendant

A The labor cost under paragraph 1.(a) of the judgment of the court below in misunderstanding the facts will be paid as benefits by prior consultation with the H head office staff.

In relation to the remaining criminal facts, Defendant B led the crime, and he did not agree with Defendant B.

The court below's sentence of unfair sentencing (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Defendant

B The punishment of the lower court (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Each sentence of the lower court against the Defendants by the Prosecutor is too unhued and unreasonable.

Judgment

Defendant

A’s assertion of misunderstanding the facts in the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, namely, ① the Defendant was in the position of a cryptian leader in the construction site of this case, who is in the position of a crypianist in charge of wooden labor workers; ② Defendant B testified from the investigative agency to the court of the court of the court of the court below that “the Defendant ordered the Defendant to put an cryp (the working day as if he worked more than the actual working day of the workers)” and ③ Defendant C and D, who was working as the head of the wooden Team team leader under the direction of the Defendant and Defendant B, knew of the fact that the Defendant also puts a false cryption in the investigative agency up to the court of the court of the court of the court below. Defendant B stated that “The Defendant sent part of the false labor cost to him and said Defendant paid part of them to him at the investigation agency’s work site of this case.” ④ Defendant B voluntarily also did not appear at the investigation agency to this court until the actual working day of this case, and sent the difference between the Defendant and the remaining wage.

I think that this money will be created B with the value of the material that it has paid.

There is no reason to reduce the cost of low materials in L manpower.

B.