사기
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
2. Defendant B shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
except that this shall not apply.
Punishment of the crime
In order to stabilize the housing of homeless workers, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport operates the system of lending the entire house rental fund to workers who borrow the house rental fund from the National Housing Fund at a rate lower than the market interest rate without securing the house rental fund.
The proposal is as follows: (a) the tenant of a false lease contract is the nominal owner; (b) Defendant B is in charge of the lessor of a false lease contract; and (c) Defendant A applied for a loan for a loan for a house lease in the name of Defendant A, along with the bromoer, applied for a loan for a loan for a house lease for workers in the name of Defendant A; and (d) is able to receive a loan from a financial institution.
Accordingly, the Defendants prepared a lease contract with Defendant B to lease KRW 90,000,00 of the lease deposit amount of KRW 701 J apartment 1 and 701, which is owned by the Defendants at the office of the I Licensed Real Estate Agent in Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, Busan, about April 2013, along with loan brokers, and received from Defendant A’s loan broker a certificate of employment, a statement of wages, and a certificate of income tax withholding that Defendant A will work as a worker of K.
However, the Defendants did not intend to enter into a lease agreement as above, and Defendant A did not work as K’s employee.
After that, on April 2013, Defendant A submitted an application for a loan of KRW 59,00,000 for the loan of KRW 59,00,00 to the employees in charge of the loan of KRW 59,00,00 in the name of the Korean bank interest branch, which is the victim in the Jung-dong-dong 532-6, Jung-gu, Jung-si, Jung-si, Gyeong-dong, and submitted a lease contract, a certificate of employment, a statement of salary, and a certificate of withholding income tax
As a result, the Defendants conspired with the loan brops, and as such, are the employees in the name of the victim bank interest branch.