beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.14 2013가단222067

구상금

Text

1. The Defendants are jointly and severally and severally liable to the Plaintiff KRW 55,383,682 as well as the next seal thereto, from September 27, 2012 to January 14, 2015.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was entrusted by the Minister of Labor under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”) to compensate workers for occupational accidents in a prompt and fair manner, and install and operate necessary insurance facilities. Defendant A is the owner and driver of the B car cars with B carle (hereinafter “life fighting cars”), and Defendant LA car damage insurance company (hereinafter “Defendant LA car”) is the insurer of LA car.

B. Around 14:00 on December 4, 2010, the victim C (hereinafter “victim”) was put into the roof expansion works of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”) located in Namyang-si, Namyang-si (hereinafter “the instant construction”) and took part in the roof extension works of E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “E”), and 3 meters away from the poles, the Defendant A’s sea-driving vehicle supported the string up to the wind of the string up to the wind without any signal, and during that process, the string back to the wind of the strings, thereby falling into the floor of the victim, getting the center of the strings and falling into the floor.

(hereinafter “the instant accident”). The principal contractor of the instant construction is E, and the person was the subcontractor’s employee belonging to the F. Industries (Representative: G), and the person was ordered to work from E at the time of the instant construction.

Defendant A, who registered his/her business with the trade name of “H”, entered into a mid-term lease agreement with “E” and puts a new sea vehicle at the construction site of this case.

C. The victims of the instant accident sustained injuries on both sides, such as the alleys, due to the instant accident.

At the time of the accident, there was no safety net, safety belt, etc., and E did not conduct occasional inspections or safety education for preventing accidents against employees, such as victims, etc.

E. The Plaintiff is under the Industrial Accident Insurance Act until September 26, 2012.