around 15:50 on September 19, 2018, the Defendant used the victim C (42 tax) who was located in the Dong branch of the Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of 6,50 won. The Defendant did not pay the amount by inserting drugs and one package of the plastic branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch of Dong branch

Summary of Evidence

1. C’s statement;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. The defendant is deemed to have led to confession of a crime when he/she is found to have committed a crime after viewing CCTV images;

However, in the last statement, “I do not memory in detail because I do not have any hyp and hypary rash.”

Since the statement " was made, it seems that the final answer to deny the crime was made."

In this regard, according to the CCTV images installed inside and outside of ambryp, D marina, and each CCTV image, the application of the law is sufficiently recognized to the effect that the Defendant: (a) clearly confirms the Defendant’s act of committing quasi-Robbery, such as the Defendant’s act of committing a quasi-Robbery, as described in the facts charged, can be seen as “the fact that the Defendant saw the victim after putting a plastic paper in D marina, putting him a drinking, and shot the victim, who followed it, and stated the victim as a ambry and a powder.”

1. Articles 335 and 333 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting the crime;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act (the favorable circumstances among the grounds for sentencing) of the Criminal Act (the grounds for sentencing);

1. The scope of applicable sentences: Imprisonment for one year and six months to fifteen years;

2. Two years to four years (basic area) from the application of the sentencing guidelines to the extent that there is no type 1 (general robbery) [the scope of recommended punishment] (the scope of recommended punishment].

3. Determination of sentence: A year and six months of imprisonment with prison labor, when the defendant requires the victim, who is the head of D Mart occupation, to pay the price for the bet and the medicine according to his/her face, he/she shall display his/her food to the victim's face.