If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On May 24, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violation of the Road Traffic Act by the Gwangju District Court.

On June 21, 2020, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol at 0.032% of alcohol level, driven a f-hurd-hurd-purd-purd-purd-purb-purd-purb-purd-purd-purd-purb-purd-purd-purd-purd-purd-purd-

Accordingly, the defendant violated Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act not less than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The circumstantial statement of the employee;

1. Notification of the result of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Previous records: Criminal records and other inquiries, and the application of Acts and subordinate statutes related to investigation reports;

1. Relevant Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act and the choice of fines for criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The sentencing period of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is the same criminal records of the defendant, blood alcohol concentration at the time of the crime in this case, the circumstances leading to the drunk driving, the distance and place of the drunk driving and the defendant's mistake are divided. Other factors such as the age, character and conduct of the defendant, circumstances before and after the crime in this case and all of the sentencing conditions shown in the records and arguments are considered.