근저당권설정등기말소등기절차이행
1. As to each real estate listed in the attached list to the Plaintiff, the Defendant is the Goyang District Court's High Court's High Court's High Court.
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. Around May 28, 2013, the Plaintiff received a request from ASEAN to the effect that he/she would purchase a mobile phone in the Plaintiff’s name, and received three copies of the certificate of personal seal impression and the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate by entrusting her with the certificate of personal seal impression and identification card, and then issued C a copy of the said certificate of personal seal impression and the Plaintiff’s resident registration certificate.
B. C created a seal similar to the Plaintiff’s seal imprint, and forged a power to register the establishment of a mortgage in the name of the Plaintiff, and affixed the seal of the person liable for registration, instead of the Plaintiff, affixed the seal of the person liable for registration, and delegated the application for registration of the establishment of a mortgage on each real estate listed in the separate sheet owned by the Plaintiff to the F judicial scrivener E located in Jincheon-gun, Jin
C. According to the above application for registration, the registration of the establishment of a mortgage near the debtor C and the mortgagee as the defendant was completed with respect to each real estate indicated in the separate sheet as the Goyang Branch of the Ji Government District Court on June 3, 2013 as the maximum debt amount of KRW 150,000,000,000, the maximum debt amount of which was received on June 3,
(hereinafter referred to as “the establishment registration of the creation of the neighboring district of this case”). [Grounds for recognition] / Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1-13 (including the paper number), appraiser G’s unmanned appraisal result, the purport of the whole pleadings.
2. According to the facts of the judgment on the cause of the claim, since the registration of the establishment of a mortgage of this case was completed by forged documents, and it is judged that the registration of the establishment of a mortgage of this case was invalid, the defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure of cancellation of the establishment of a
3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified.