beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2019.05.10 2018나53139

손해배상(기)

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part of the claim against the Plaintiff A, including the claim extended by the Plaintiff A in this court.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the court of first instance’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the first instance judgment, in addition to the dismissal or addition of the following judgments, thereby citing the first instance judgment as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

From the fourth to the fifth class of the judgment of the first instance, the first to the fifth class are as follows.

(1) The fact that there is no dispute over recognition of actual profit) : Gap 3 and 4 x 2. The results of physical evaluation entrusted to the president of the Busan University Hospital, and the overall purport of the pleadings are as follows: plaintiff 1 was paid 4,675,362 won (annual 5,104,350) around 2015 x 36.5 x 36.6% of the maximum working age from 36.5 x 36% of the day of the instant accident (annual 5.6% of the maximum working age from 36.5 x 7.6% of the maximum working age from 36.6% of the day of hospitalization to 36.6% of the day of the instant accident: plaintiff 2.6% of the maximum working age from 36.6% of the day of hospitalization to 36.6% of the day of May 29, 2016 to day of 18.6% of the instant case's maximum working age.