If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

The defendant is a person who has no fixed occupation.

1. On October 13, 2010, the Defendant forged private documents: (a) around 13:46, in order to establish a mobile phone within the 1st floor D store operated by the Victim B; (b) the name and resident registration number of a third party, which the “E,” which was opened on the Internet’s application form for new mobile phone in the “Internet” program, was obtained by entering the name and resident registration number of the third party in the “E” program in the “Internet” program; and (c) the Defendant forged the document in the “F” column, “G” in the resident registration number column, and the address column, by affixing the “F” on the applicant’s column.

2. At the same time and place as the preceding paragraph of the current investigation document, the Defendant submitted the foregoing new mobile phone application form to B, who is unaware of the fact, as if it were duly formed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The police statement concerning B;

1. Application of statutes on investigation reports;

1. Articles 234 and 231 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Selection of an alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;