The Defendant is a driver of a large 40 tons of b5 tons of b5 tons of b.30 tons of d.30 tons of b.40 tons of b.m. container shower (hereinafter referred to as “large b.m. vehicle”).

On October 20, 2013, the Defendant: (a) driven a large-scale truck on the 20:10 square meters; (b) driven by the said large-scale truck, along with a two-lane road near the jun-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri-ri (.

Accordingly, the victim reduced the speed of the said new frequency truck, and first, the FF vehicle of the said new frequency changed to the future course of the said new frequency truck, followed by the Defendant’s large freight vehicle, and subsequently, the Defendant’s large freight vehicle attempted to overtake the said new frequency in the future, but failed to stick, and the vehicle continued to run on the first lane of the said new frequency truck with the two-lanes, while the said vehicle continued to run on the same side of the said new frequency truck, the Defendant’s large freight was able to move ahead of the vehicle by changing its course in the future of the said new frequency vehicle by decreasing the speed of about 65 kilometers per hour.

However, as the above E's vehicle runs without a speed, the victim's new-frequency truck was changed to one lane by raising the speed, and then the two-lanes of the above E's vehicle passed along the two-lanes, then overtaking the vehicle to follow the Defendant's large cargo vehicle.

The Defendant, while proceeding on a speed of about 78 kilometers for the above large cargo vehicle, is running down at the speed.