2. In full view of the arguments of this case and the reasons for sentencing indicated in the records, namely, the background and degree of damage of the crime of this case, the defendant committed the crime of this case during the repeated crime period despite a number of criminal records including the same crime, the damage from the crime of this case has not been recovered, and the defendant's age, character, character, environment, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing of the court below seems to have been properly determined by fully considering all the circumstances, including the various reasons for sentencing asserted by the defendant, and there are no special circumstances to the extent that the sentencing should be changed ex post facto. Therefore

3. As such, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit.