beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.07.22 2015고정1454

명예훼손

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person who operated the “D Motor Vehicle Driving Institute” in Seo-gu Incheon, and the victim E is a person who operates the F inspection.

The defendant was aware of the victim while attending the above temple, and was introduced to G as a former public official to help the victim receive a large amount of compensation, etc. in the process of moving the above site of a private teaching institute. The economic damage of the KRW 00 million occurred due to G, which caused the victim to give an undecent appraisal.

A. On November 23, 2013, the Defendant, along with H and I, found in the coffee shop operated by K in Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, Kimpo-si, and met with H, K, H, and I, with respect to the victim “E was set back for 13 years from I and 13 years, and you returned to another male while she was dead, and she led to a trouble with the other male.

Therefore, I, between E and another man of the private rights, "I,"

Doz. Doz. Doz.

The victim’s reputation was damaged by openly pointing out facts, such as talking to the effect that the Defendant “I would not know the actual inspection,” which read “I would not be a short-term, but a short-term, small-term, and small-term, small-scale, small-scale, and small-term, small-scale, and small-term, small-term, medium-sized.”

B. On September 2013, the Defendant “E and K” to N in “M” located in L on or around September 2013.

N N was not at the time of phone call to E because E was the same as K.

G is a person introduced to E.B.

G and E are not the same with the money brought about by fraud of G.

E made a talk to the effect that “E is operating and not operating G.”

However, the victim was not in a relationship with K, and was in a relationship of internal relations.

In K, N did not receive N's phone, and there was no use of the defendant's money together with G.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts as above.

Summary of Evidence

1...