A Imprisonment of 10 months, Defendant B's imprisonment of 6 months, Defendant C's imprisonment of 10 months, and Defendant E of 6 months.

G is the representative director of the corporation I (hereinafter referred to as “I”) established for the purpose of manufacturing plastic facilities and constructing plastic facilities at H in Spocheon-si in Spocheon-si, and Defendant A is the general manager as the I business director, and Defendant B is the deputy head of I business.

Defendant

C is the team leader of J of the Seocheon-gun of Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant D and Defendant E are the persons engaged in the deep field farming in the Socheon-gun of Gyeonggi-do, the members of J of the Seocheon-gun of Gyeonggi-do, and Defendant F is the persons engaged in the deep field farming in the Goyang-si of Gyeonggi-do, the persons engaged in the deep field farming in the Goyang-si of Gyeonggi-do, and K is the persons engaged in the greenhouse farming in the Namcheon-gun of Gangwon-do, respectively.

In order to create a production complex of facilities in accordance with M projects, the former Youngcheon-gun paid 50% of the costs of growing greenhouse amounts (Do 15%, 35% of the military expenses) as local subsidies, the Gangwon-do Ycheon-gun paid 50% of the costs of installing the facilities in the quantity of greenhouse facilities in accordance with N projects in 2013 as local subsidies, and the 50% of the costs of installing the facilities in the quantity of greenhouse facilities (Gun expenses 50%) as part of the O projects in 2014 as local subsidies (Do 20%, 30% of the military expenses) as local subsidies, and the 50% of the R projects (Gun expenses 50%) as local subsidies, and the remaining 50% of the Sinyang-si in Gyeonggi-do paid 50% of the S projects (national expenses 20%, and 30% of the local subsidies) as subsidies, respectively, and the remaining 50% of the subsidized project operator should undertake the project.

G and the Defendants, despite being aware that the subsidized project operator ought to bear part of the project cost as above, pretended that the subsidized project operator would have borne the self-paid cost, received the excessive subsidy appropriated by the State and the relevant local government, and intended to receive some of the subsidized project operator, or submitted the construction details of the vinyl, etc. already installed, to receive a false subsidy.

1. Fraud;

A. Defendant A and Defendant B’s joint crimes 1).