대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant B: 139,149,929 won;
(b) jointly and severally with each of the Defendant B inherit from the networkF;
1. The following facts do not conflict between the Parties:
The plaintiff received a payment order from the defendant B and the net F (hereinafter referred to as the "the deceased") in the case of the claim for loans from the Busan District Court 202 tea6475, and the claim amount at the time is as shown in the attached Table 1.
B. After that, Defendant B and the Deceased shall pay interest of 13,137,185 won on May 20, 2010, interest of 88,815 won on February 22, 2012, interest of 124,780 won on March 6, 2012, and interest of 98 won on January 31, 2013 and remain at present are as shown in the attached Table 2.
C. After the Deceased died on December 4, 2018, the Defendant C (the husband’s share of inheritance 3/9), Defendant B, D, and E (the husband’s share of inheritance 2/9) jointly inherited at the corresponding inheritance share of the deceased.
(c).
On July 22, 2020, Defendant C, D, and E were subject to a trial of limited recognition inherited by the Busan Family Court of Law No. 2020, 20080.
2. The above defendant B's assertion that the defendant could not respond to the plaintiff's claim due to the lack of ability to repay at present, but this cannot be a legitimate legal ground for refusing the plaintiff's claim.
3. If so, the plaintiff's claim of this case seeking to prevent the expiration of the extinctive prescription of the above payment order is with merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.