On November 14, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00 on November 14, 2012, the Defendant: (b) placed the victim’s 1st underground floor in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (B); (c) placed the victim as if he would pay the alcohol value; and (d) placed an order for drinking and drinking. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he did not order drinking and drinking because he did not have any money during the time.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was provided with two diseases, one day per two times per two weeks in total amounting to KRW 560,000 from the victim.

Around 15:20 on November 24, 2012, 2012, the Defendant: (a) calculated the hospital expenses of the victim G; (b) taken account of the children; (c) taken account of gallon 2 HD smartphones in an amount equivalent to KRW 900,000,000, the victim’s market value; (d) taken one gallon jus2 HD smartphones; (e) one gallon card; and (e) one gallon card; and (e) the agricultural card No. 3661, the Defendant stolen and stolen the cresh in which the gallon was placed on the accounting platform.

around 20:00 on December 17, 2012, the Defendant, “J” under the control of the victim I on H-1 floor in Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, ordered the victim to provide alcohol and alcohol as if he would pay the alcohol value. However, the Defendant did not have any intent or ability to pay the price even if he did not order alcohol and alcohol due to lack of money at the time.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim, was provided with a sirens equivalent to KRW 740,00 in total from the victim, 17 years 1, a window, 12 years 12, and Agju, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police interrogation protocol against the accused;

1. Each police statement made to G and I;

1. C’s statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 347 (1) or 329 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes. Article 347 (Selection of Imprisonment)

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for the reasons under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent crimes;