When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The Defendant is a person who lacks the ability to discern things or make decisions due to polar disorder.

[2014 High Court Decision 1766]

1. On February 26, 2014, at around 02:45, the Defendant: (a) opened a entrance and intruded at a place beyond the victim E’s mother, a male-parent-gu, Namdong-gu, Incheon, Namdong-gu, in the middle-gu, Incheon.

2. The Defendant damaged the property by destroying the property owned by the victim and causing the damage to its effect of repairing the property by impairing the residence at the time and place described in paragraph (1), as seen above, and then destroying the property by making it impossible for D to use it for repair costs by making it difficult for D to lock up the door in the room by drinking out the door, making it possible for D to take out the door-to-door visit, and paying a hole to the extent to come into human body.

[2014 High Court Decision 205]

3. On March 25, 2014, at around 02:26, the Defendant: (a) sent the text message of the said D’s bath; (b) entered the 1st floor entrance door through the gate where the said D’s house was found and no correction was made; and (c) damaged the 2nd floor entrance door of the said 2nd floor; and (d) invaded the said victim’s residence.

4. When the Defendant intrudes as described in paragraph 3, the Defendant destroyed the door of the locking door door to the shower, thereby destroying the door to the end of the locking door, and by shoting an anti-government into the right angle, which was made up of the right angles in the 1st floor of the earth, and by cutting off the water meter installed on the wall off, and then damaging the property owned by the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to field photographs and damaged objects;

1. Relevant Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 319(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines for negligence;

1. Articles 10 (2) and 55 (1) 6 of the Criminal Act for statutory mitigation;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall apply to concurrent crimes;