beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2015.05.29 2014나37288

손해배상(기)

Text

1. All appeals filed by the plaintiffs are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning for the court’s explanation concerning this case is as stated in the judgment of the court of first instance, except in cases where the part of the judgment of the court of first instance is rewritten or added as stated in the following 2. Thus, it shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2.No more than 22 pages 12 of the first instance judgment shall be followed in the following cases:

As seen below 2), the Defendants’ joint tort is not recognized inasmuch as the breach of duty under the Trust Act is not recognized as well as the Defendants’ joint tort. From the first instance court’s 24th to 5th 7th e.g., the first instance court’s judgment. 6th 6th 6th 7th e.g., the Plaintiffs asserted that the instant apartment 170 households were sold at low price under a condition more favorable to high-value than 115 households. However, the Plaintiffs asserted that the entry of the evidence No. 17 was insufficient to acknowledge it, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. 7th 7th 5th e.g., the sales price of the Defendants reaches 50,029,535,440 won on the ground of 30th 7th 6th e.g., the total sale price of the Plaintiff’s individual sale method under the apartment e., the e., 170th 7th e.g., the sale price increase in the sale price.