On October 16, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to 8 months of imprisonment for fraud in Seoul Southern District Court and 2 years of suspended execution, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 24, 2013.

Criminal facts

On August 2012, the Victim Treatment Manpower Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “victim”) decided to supply human resources to the “Dtel” (hereinafter “Dtel”) newly built in Hongsung City Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “SY construction”), and the Defendant was the Eth of the construction site of this case. The payment method of the wages was the method of submitting the receipt of confirmation of the work signed by the Defendant F on the Hong Kong Construction Site Work site after the Defendant took part in the work and submitted it to the victimized Company for the confirmation of the work signed by the Defendant F on a daily basis, and distributed it by receiving the wages of the husband from the victimized Company. The victimized Company was the way of settling it with Hong Kong Construction after a certain period.

During the process of receiving wages in the above manner, the Defendant claimed a false wage to the victimized company using the formal supervision over red-interest construction site work F, and he had an ability to do so with the device.

On September 22, 2012, the Defendant submitted the “work confirmation receipt (daily work)” and “the output in September 22, 2012 (9/22)” prepared by the Defendant to the effect that, at the office of the victimized company located in Geumcheon-gu Seoul, Geumcheon-gu, Seoul, the Defendant had engaged in the Defendant’s work equivalent to KRW 1,089,000, wage with eight persons.

However, the Defendant did not perform the above work at the construction site of the instant officetel on September 22, 2012.

The Defendant received KRW 1,089,000,00 from an employee in the name of the victimized company as wages, from that time, from that time to January 12, 2013, the Defendant received KRW 40,061,00 in total by the same method over 50 times, as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Form.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings employees from the name of the victimized company to deliver property from the victimized company.