If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On December 3, 2017, the Defendant: (a) entered a victim’s room 206 heading rooms of the above hospital building (206) hospitalized by the victim E on December 3, 2017; and (b) entered the victim’s knife one knife to the victim; and (c) laid down the victim’s knife with “this knife to the victim.”

The phrase “the victim was threatened equally,” and the victim was threatened.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A damage statement of E;

1. The application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of recording of statements by victims);

1. Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of criminal facts and punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The rationale for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act on November 8, 2016, which was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months from the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court on November 8, 2016, and committed the instant crime during the grace period, is an unfavorable circumstance.

However, a fine shall be imposed in consideration of favorable circumstances, such as the fact that he/she has received a letter from the injured party and agreed to do so smoothly, the fact that he/she is receiving a medication due to a kidney function, and the health is not good after the operation of cutting the left bridge, and the fact that he/she reflects the wrong

The summary of this part of the facts charged in this part of the indictment is that the defendant assaulted the victim by making the victim's face one time by hand on the ground that the victim E, who was not good from the first floor of D Council member D on December 3, 2017, located in Daejeon Jung-gu, Daejeon, would have come to know from the elevator of the first floor of D Council member D on December 3, 2017.

The above facts charged are crimes falling under Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the clearly expressed will of the victim under Article 260 (3) of the same Act.

In such a case, the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on April 24, 2018, which was after the prosecution of this case, and thus, the prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.