A. On May 16, 2016, the Plaintiff purchased a 11m2 of land for a factory in Daegu-gu E-gu (hereinafter “instant land”) and registered in its name.

B. The Defendant Incorporated Foundation is the owner of a building with a size of 230 square meters and its ground adjacent to the instant land, and Defendant B operates a licensed real estate agent office in the name of “G Licensed Real Estate Agent” on the first floor of the above ground building.

C. Defendant C is the owner of H large-26 square meters and its ground buildings adjacent to the instant land, and Defendant C is operating the Suwon Market in the mutual name of “I” by leasing the first floor of the above ground buildings to Defendant D.

The non-party J, who leased part of a building on the ground from the Maintenance Foundation of the defendant Yangyang-dong, established a wood group on the (A) part of the building connected each point of the annexed drawing Nos. 1, 2, 5, 4, and 1 among the land in this case, and thereafter the plaintiff filed the lawsuit in this case, the J removed it and returned the relevant land.

E. Defendant C and D shall install ground structures, such as keyboards, air conditioners, and LPG gas pipes, in the part of the ship (B) connecting each point of the annexed drawings Nos. 2, 3, 6, 5, and 2 among the land of this case, and possess the part (b) above.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including provisional number)

hereinafter the same shall apply.

(ii)each entry of Eul-A-1, 2, 3, and 4 and the purport of the entire pleadings;

2. According to the facts of recognition of the above part of the claim against Defendant Yangyang-dong Maintenance Foundation and B, it can be known that Nonparty J, who leased the ground building from the Defendant Yang Yang-dong Maintenance Foundation, removed a wooden club established after the instant lawsuit and returned this part of the land to the Plaintiff. Thus, the Plaintiff’s removal of this part and the request for extradition is no longer reasonable.

Therefore, we cannot accept this part of the plaintiff's claim.

3. Defendant C, .