2. In light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized his mistake; (b) there is no means of criminal punishment other than the one-time imprisonment, and (c) there is no means of criminal punishment; (d) the fact that the Defendant is a recipient of basic livelihood security guards is damaged by means of reporting block without any reason; (b) the nature of the crime is not good; (c) the lower court did not agree with the victim; and (d) the lower court appears to have determined the punishment by fully taking into account the favorable circumstances for the Defendant; and (e) the fact that there seems to exist no changes in circumstances that could vary between the lower court and the Defendant; and (b) the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable in light of the circumstances leading up to the instant crime, the circumstances after the crime, the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and environment, etc.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.