A. The Defendant of mistake of facts was found to have exceeded his mother and child in order to verify his face, and did not do the assault as stated in the judgment below.

B. The sentence imposed by the court below on the defendant (two million won of fine) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below regarding the assertion of mistake of facts: (i) victim I and J are consistently and consistently stated from the investigative agency to the court of the court below in detail the process and method of assault, and the part of assault, etc. of the defendant; (ii) even if the video of the video (information and documentary evidence) taken at the time is based on the victim I, the defendant is called the victim I's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's ' 's 's 's '.

B. The Defendant committed the instant crime in a somewhat contingent and contingent manner in the situation where he or she fights on his or her body with the desire between the G Council members and the remuneration organization members after the completion of the first trial of the instant case, and the Defendant did not have any criminal record of violence, etc. favorable to the Defendant.