However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 23, 2016, around 02:20, the Defendant committed an indecent act against the victim by attracting the victim from the victim E (one’s name, two-eight years old) who danced at the “D” club located in Bupyeong-si, Seocheon-si, 2016.

[Judgment on the argument of the defendant and his defense counsel] The defendant and his defense counsel asserted that the defendant did not commit an indecent act against the victim.

In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by this Court, the defendant can sufficiently recognize the fact that the defendant committed the indecent act in this case.

① The victim appeared as a witness in this court and made a statement that he was aware of the fact that he was sexually aware of the fact that he was sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually sexually

② In this case, the issue is whether the above victim committed an indecent act is the defendant. With regard to the situation in which the victim was identified as the person who committed an indecent act against himself, the victim also tried to do so in this court, and the defendant first tried to do so in the middle of the second and third-lane victim, and it was caused by the defendant's winding in the middle of the second and third-lane victim, and the second and third victim was the same person who interfered with the second and third victim's behavior. In addition, the victim and the defendant stated that he was the same person as the victim. The distance and location of the victim and the defendant (which was able to confirm the face of the victim because it was attached) and the surrounding situation, but the victim's face was near.