When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) on the road in front of the “Korea-style Park” located in 32-21, Namnam-ro, Seogu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-ro, 32-21, and “the road is lost” on the roads; (b) the background leading up to B district unit of the police station B and slope D sent upon receipt of a report 112, and the Defendant “the Defendant shall be subject to the patrol vehicle.”

I would like to go to a large way.

“In the event that the report was made at any time, why is?”

There is no need.

(d) Duch fluor of a fluort fluor.

“In one hand, the part of the above D’s working clothes was frightened, and the part of the above D’s right-side abundance was frightened on the floor after the one hand.

As a result, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 136 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act does not relax the nature of obstructing the execution of official duties for sentencing of the Criminal Procedure Act. However, considering the Defendant’s confession of the instant crime, the Defendant’s primary crime with no record of criminal punishment, and the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and circumstance of the instant crime, and all other circumstances constituting the condition for sentencing, such as the following circumstances, the punishment is determined as ordered.