A shall be punished by imprisonment for four months, by a fine of 1,500,000 won.

However, as to Defendant A, this shall not apply.

[2013 Highest 3384] Defendant B (name D prior to the opening of name) was unable to operate a business in the name of the Republic of Korea due to the failure to perform the business before the opening of the business. On May 2012, Defendant B (name D prior to the opening of name) entered into a contract for the number of shares with Defendant A at the U.S. branch office located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, for the purpose of enabling the company to perform the business in the name of the lending of the title, and later, for the purpose of enabling the company to perform the business in the name of the lending of the title, upon the request of the representative director of the E, and entered into a contract for the number of shares with Defendant A at the U.S. branch office located in the Seoul Northern-gu, Seoul Metropolitan Government, with Defendant A, while substantially operating

Defendant

A around October 10, 2012, at the office of (ju) E located in the Nam-si, Namyang-si, a check number G, par value of KRW 16,50,000, issue date of KRW 20 December 20, 2012, Defendant B issued one check number per share in the name of (ju) E, the representative director, and issued one check number per share in the name of (ju) E, which is the date of presentment for payment, and did not have to be paid as a suspension of transaction, even if the holder presented payment on December 20, 2012, which is within the period of presentment for payment, from that time until December 18, 2012, as described in the attached Table 1 and 2, the Defendant B’s representative director is the Defendant B’s representative director, and issued two copies of the check number per share number of KRW 31,00,000 per share in the name of (ju), and paid as deposit or suspension within the period of payment.

As a result, the Defendants conspired to issue the above check and presented it within the time limit for payment, but did not receive the deposit shortage or the suspension of transaction.

[2013 Highest 3833] The Defendant, in order to obtain the business registration certificate of H’s E, has arbitrarily prepared a written consent for the reappointment of factory in H’s name, and had the intent to submit it to the Namyang Yangyang Tax Office.

1. On March 26, 2012, the Defendant forged a private document to E Co., Ltd. (StateJ) in the office of the E Co., Ltd. located in F in Namyang-si, Namyang-si.