When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On February 12, 2014, the Defendant, despite the absence of the intent or ability to sell normal goods even at a place that is not known from the victim B, posted an article on the trading site of goods at the Internet, and received KRW 200,000 from the damaged party to the account of the National Bank in the name of the National Bank in the name of the name of the National Bank in the attached Form 10 times, and acquired the total of KRW 1,982,700 through 10 times as shown in the list of crimes in the attached Table.

Summary of Evidence

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of each police suspect against the accused;

1. Each police statement made with respect to D, E, and F;

1. Each statement of G, H, B, I, J, K, L, M and N;

1. Each investigation report and internal investigation report;

1. The Kakao Stockholm conversation content data, confirmation of deposits without passbooks, confirmation data on the details of transactions to be identified, identification data, the details of each message closure, closure data on the results of transfer, identification of transaction records, transaction records by transaction account, identification of transaction records, records by transaction account, immediately transferred records, screen of each text message, results of transfer, inquiry, details of deposit and withdrawal transactions, and application of financial transaction statutes;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69(2) of the former Criminal Act (Amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014);

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Article 334(1) or more of the Criminal Procedure Act.