2. A favorable circumstance exists, such as that the Defendant, who has no record of criminal punishment, recognized the crime of this case as an initial offender with no record of criminal punishment, and showed an attitude against it.

However, considering the fact that the act of arranging sexual traffic does not have a significant social hazard, such as harming the sound sexual culture and good morals by commercializing women's sex, and that there is a need for a simple and strict punishment in order to prevent the spread of illegal sexual traffic establishments and to establish a sound sexual culture, and other circumstances that form the sentencing conditions specified in the records and arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, character and behavior, the environment, the details and contents of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, it cannot be deemed that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.