The judgment below

Examining the evidence duly adopted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the judgment, the court below was just to have determined that the facts charged for the guilty portion of this case was recognized on the grounds as stated in its reasoning. Contrary to the allegations in the grounds of appeal, the court below did not err by misapprehending the law of logic and experience and exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to Article 18(2)3 and 18(2)1 of the Personal Information Protection Act, or by misapprehending the legal principles as to legitimate act and constructive acceptance, or by omitting judgment, or by omitting judgment.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.