However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 30, 2016, at a singing room operated by the victim C in Daegu-gu, Nam-gu, Daegu-gu, on October 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took entertainment from that time to that time by five (5) A; and (b) the victim requesting to do so, “I am under the influence of alcohol since then, I am under the influence of alcohol; and (c) I am under the influence of alcohol.”

"A person who commits an act of harming the victim with the desire of the victim and committing saluting, etc.", and again, the victim is different from the victim.

Defect, Doese Doese Doese Doese Doese

On October 31, 2016, from around 03:20 on October 31, 2016 to around 1 hour, such as police ra, Crop, Cropian, and hinging, refused the request of the victim, and did not leave the place, thereby hindering the victim's singing practice, such as having to complete the business of the day, have to return home for the next business.

2. On October 31, 2016, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties at the instant singing room on or around 04:46 on October 31, 2016. On that day, at around 04:26, the Defendant called to the site and was under the influence of alcohol, and sent the Defendant at a singing room to a slope affiliated with the Daegu Southern Police Station to a slope of the Daegu Southern Police Station in order to have the Defendant informed the Defendant, who was in the singing room, and send the Defendant at the home. The Defendant is whether he talked with the intention of drinking and drinking in this context.

Is the public authority Doz. Doz.

C. Whether he belongs to him; and

The police officer assaulted the police officer, such as questioning his personal information to return home and drinking the chest part of the police officer's chest part of the police officer's house in order to cause him to fall off on the floor.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties concerning the handling of the 112 reported case by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes in writing C;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with business), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of interference with the performance of public duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Code, Article 38 Section 1 of the Criminal Code, which increases concurrent crimes.