beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.09.27 2016나61067

잔여재산분배청구

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The plaintiff's conjunctive claim added by this court is all dismissed.

3...

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff newly constructed the three retail stores, houses, and religious facilities (law party) on the ground of reinforced concrete structure, flat 220 square meters (hereinafter “instant site”) on the ground of Mayang-si, the Plaintiff owned by the Plaintiff, and completed the registration of the Plaintiff’s ownership in the name of the Gwangju District Court No. 6941 as of May 9, 1997, as to the instant Mayang-si, the Gwangju District Court’s Mayang-si, the Gwangju District Court’s Mayang-si, the Gwangju District Court’s Mayang-si, 220 square meters (hereinafter “

B. The defendant completed the registration of establishment of chonsegwon on November 26, 1997 as to the site of this case and the party branch by the same registry office under the Act No. 16257, which was received on November 26, 1997, for establishing a right to lease on a deposit basis. The defendant completed the registration of establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis as to the lease on a deposit basis. The registration of establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis was revoked on December 29, 1998 as of December 28, 1998, under the Ordinance No. 20824, which was received on December 29, 1998, for the reason of a contract for change of lease on a deposit basis. The registration of establishment of a right to lease on a deposit basis was completed on December 31, 2003, and thereafter on October 1, 1999.

C. Meanwhile, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Plaintiff on the claim for cancellation of the registration of the establishment of the right to lease on a deposit basis (hereinafter “the right to lease on a deposit basis”) with the Gwangju District Court 99Gahap4178. On January 29, 2000, the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to withdraw the said lawsuit on January 29, 200 where the said lawsuit is pending, that the Plaintiff owned KRW 150 million out of the total market price as to the instant site and Maposium.

No. 260, No. 2000, No. 260, No. 2000, No. 2000, No. 20000, No. 20000, No. 2010, No. 1

(d). d.