However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 7, 2018, the Defendant: (a) committed assault to the head of the police station affiliated with the said C District, which instructed the immediately preceding Defendant to enter the said district on the ground that he did not have a cab because he was in Gangwon-gu B C District District of the Cheongju-gu Seoul District Police Station, and that he did not get a sib, thereby obstructing police officers’ affairs, such as filing reports and handling civil petitions.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on damaged photographs and CCTV photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act are recognized as the crime of sentencing, the fact that there is no record of criminal punishment heavier than that of the same kind of crime or fine, the degree of tangible force of the defendant's exercise, the necessity of strict punishment for the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, and all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, character and conduct, motive for the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., which are the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, shall