However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On April 7, 2017, the Defendant driven Bone Star Frops under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.25% at a distance of about 7km from the front side of the Gannam University Sexual Hospital to the public health clinic located in the Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, at approximately 170 m22, at the time of Ansan-si around 10:29, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.25%.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Inquiries about the results of crackdown on drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on the circumstances of drivers at home;

1. Article 148-2 (2) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. Although the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, despite the fact that the defendant had been punished for driving alcohol, the crime of this case was committed, and the amount of alcohol concentration in blood is very high, the crime of this case is not light.

However, it is decided as ordered by considering the fact that the defendant is against the defendant, there is no record of punishment exceeding fine, there is no record of punishment for drinking for the last ten years, and all other sentencing conditions such as the age and environment of the defendant.