However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

1. From around 1986, the Defendant, such as the party status, entered into an internal relationship with the former husband D before the victim C, and became aware of the fact, around April 11, 1997, the Defendant continued to live together while maintaining a de facto marital relationship with D and maintaining a de facto marital relationship with D even after having been divorced from the above D, and caused the failure of the de facto marital relationship to the victim, and the said D was caused by the failure of the de facto marital relationship to the victim, and was able to live together with the above C’s house following the Defendant’s death.

In fact, although the above D did not reside in the victim C's house, the defendant claimed that the above C's house was low from around 2008 without night, and that the above D had found the above D's house from time to time, and caused the above D's intrusion upon the above C's house or the above D's house in order to confirm whether it was in the above C's house, the above D's house was invaded with the deceased's house or the above house's house, and the deceased's family members, such as the above C's father, son, and the above C's son's son's son, and the above act was repeated over several times until October 27, 2012, notwithstanding the Seoul Central District Court's decision to prohibit access.

In addition, around November 22, 2010, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming consolation money against the said C with the Seoul Central District Court, but was ruled against the said C on March 22, 2012.

2. Crimes by defendants;

A. On April 2012, the injured Defendant: (a) around 14:00 on the front day of the victim F (one’s name) located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul, Seoul; (b) around July 31, 2009, the injured Defendant drafted a written statement at the time when the said C’s father G applied for a provisional injunction against access to the Defendant against the Defendant by the Seoul Central District Court; (c) on the ground that “the victim’s son’s wife prepared the written statement at around July 31, 2009 against the Defendant, the victim’s face was 3 to 4 times, and the victim’s hand her hand her hand is her hand.”