A. On November 3, 2014, the fact that Defendant A, C, D, E, and F submitted a written withdrawal of appeal to the effect that “The Defendant in this case withdraws an appeal” to this court is evident on the record.

B. 1) The above Defendants asserted that the above Defendants’ withdrawal of appeal was submitted with the intent to withdraw the appeal on November 3, 2014 due to their economic reasons, but thereafter, the intent is to maintain the appeal as a result of a change in their intention. Therefore, the above Defendants’ taking of appeal is not effective. 2) It is obvious that it is the unilateral litigation by the appellant against the appellate court, which withdraws a group of appeals filed by the withdrawal of appeal and terminates the proceedings of the appellate court, and it is obvious that the lawsuit is pending in the appellate court, barring any special provision or special circumstance. Thus, the provisions on legal acts under the Civil

As such, the invalidation or revocation cannot be asserted on the ground of the defect in declaration of intention, such as fraud, coercion or mistake.

(3) In light of the above legal principle, the above Defendants filed a written withdrawal of appeal on November 3, 2014, and so long as the above Defendants submitted the written withdrawal of appeal on November 3, 2014, the pertinent appeal is lawful and cannot be withdrawn at will, and the above Defendants’ withdrawal of appeal can not be withdrawn or revoked. (4) Ultimately, the part between the Plaintiff and the above Defendants in the instant lawsuit among the instant lawsuit became effective upon November 3, 2014, by which the aforementioned Defendants submitted the written withdrawal of appeal. Thus, the part between the Plaintiff and the said Defendants in the instant lawsuit became effective upon November 3, 2014, and thus, the said written withdrawal of appeal was declared as to the part between the Plaintiff and the Defendants.

2. Determination as to the part between the Defendant (Appointed Party) B and the designated parties among the instant lawsuit

A. On April 22, 1913, 1 L of the basic facts was examined as follows: (a) on April 22, 1913, 604 square meters prior to the Young-gun, Gyeonggi-do.

The above land was divided into the N on May 28, 1940 at 366 N, 179 P, and 59 P, and the above O.